Because it was never adequately addressed at all

Published: April 21, 2011, 3:22 am ET
Contributor

I wrote what was supposed to be my last article last week. Upon reflection, yes, there are a lot more things that I could and should have written about, and I feel sincere regret for being unable to do so. There is one issue, though, that I cannot leave unaddressed without destroying my conscience — it is an issue that was hugely controversial two years ago, blew up into a debate, tilted to one side as one half of the debate grew increasingly intimidated and subsequently disappeared to the point of nonexistence for students admitted post-2008.

This issue is “the Kappa Sig email”. The email itself and its author, “Roscoe Jenkins” (yes, sadly but seriously, his codename), got an incredible dose of attention and scrutiny at the time of its circulation, and the other side needs the counter shout-out, loud and clear. I got this one.

I want to first preface my eventual claim with a little contextual information about Richmond’s campus (then and now — I promise, campus is the same), around which this infamous email circulated. Some of you know (and some of you, regrettably, may not know) that the national rape statistic is currently set at one out of six women — that is, that men sexually assault an average of one out of every six women every year in America. This statistic narrows to one out of every four women on college campuses nationwide.

These are just numbers, but put it in perspective. If you are hanging out with eight girls at D-hall, two of them have been or will be victims of sexual assault. If you are in a class of 24 people, 12 of which are female, three of them are likely to be victims. If you have four very close female friends — or, say, two close female friends and two biological sisters — on college campuses nationwide right now (and in 2008), you can expect one of them to be a target of sexual assault, at least once. That gets a little uncomfortable right?

Well the situation is significantly worse on Richmond’s campus. I’m not working with statistics on this one, but my own pretty intense experiences, which I strongly believe to be more convincing. Consider the following (names have been eliminated, including my own):

Out of eight female graduates with whom I consider myself close friends from the classes of 2007 and 2008, only one had not been the victim of attempted or completed sexual assault – and she felt the need to attribute this, when telling the story two years ago in a very casual setting, to the fact that she had an older male relative on campus.

Of the others, three were the victims of rape more than one time throughout their college career.

Rape experiences included waking up from an inebriated coma to find a man — a “close friend,” no less — engaging in sexual intercourse with what had been her sleeping body; being locked in a room with no way out and promised exit upon “consent” to do sexual acts, which were then pushed far beyond what “consent” (if that’s what it ever truly was in that perverse setting) had permitted; and being undressed and forcibly penetrated by a fraternity brother (which all of these attackers were, by the way) while in an inebriated and vulnerable state of visible nausea, even after distinctly, repetitively and clearly stating “no.”

These cases are among others, but I have listed the ones that I have heard from more than one girl on this campus at one point or another throughout my four years here. All these girls suffered in psychological, physical, and/or emotional ways following their respective rapes, but did not report the incidents out of embarrassment and fear, the latter of both social and physical consequences because of backlash from their rapists.

All of their rapists consider themselves “friends” of their victims to this day. All of the rapists had been fraternity members at the times when they raped these victims and others besides.

The following are stories I have collected throughout my time at this school, from people who are my age or younger (so, still on campus). Again, this is not an exhaustive account of all I have experienced and/or heard, but it is a representative sample of the types of stories I have heard time and again from multiple female students from various grade levels. Women report feeling hands up their skirts and dresses – even inside their panty-lines – from male counterparts with whom they have danced at various lodges.

Women report being pushed physically past limitations they had vocalized for “hooking up” with male partners they had known at a wide variety of intimacy levels (including campus boyfriends).

Women report being physically held down by men upon vocalizing their hesitation to engage in one or another sexual act, some men of whom appeared to exercise this physical restraint with a nonchalant or even humorous attitude.

Women report being verbally humiliated through threats and insults (in a wide variety of tones and volumes) – even genuine confused questions – by men who expressed a desire to engage in one or another sexual act with the female, who declined in response. Threats included social and sexual punishment (i.e. “Do you ever want to come back to this lodge again?,” “Come on, you don’t want me to tell all my friends that you’re a [insert any number of descriptive nouns]” or the two most-repeated in informal and formal interviews – “Don’t make me make you, I want to stay friends” and “Go ahead, tell whoever you want. No one will believe you, you know that”) and even vandalism, said to or about the victim (i.e. “I’m going to that [girl's] room and cutting up all of her stuffed animals,” or “That’s it – I’m keying her car”).

All of these are direct quotes, as reported or overheard, with foul language and curse words eliminated; think of any number of ways to dispute that they are, but I assure you once again that I have only repeated stories that I have heard more than once, from people that I have checked and double-checked do not know or have not conversed with one another (not just about this subject, but) at all.

The only girls who appear safe from these situations are the girls that someone in one of my classes recently labeled “honorary women” of fraternities. These are the women who have ultimately decided to dedicate their social life to one – and, generally, only one, unless given direct or indicated permission by “their” fraternity members otherwise – fraternity. They are forced to treat fraternity members with much more dedication and respect than they would their girlfriends, which obviously (but I’ll say it anyway) perpetuates a hierarchical system; they are also encouraged, through threat of replacement (and thus unsafe positioning relative to fraternity members) via new favorite “honorary women” or refusal to show mutual disdain towards women held in contempt by fraternity members.

These girls are generally isolated or in competition with their peers, and tend to take a leading stance on victim-blaming for “knowing the guys” that are accused. Many of them know their own traitorous position in defending rapists, but as all girls and few boys learn from an early age – “safety first.” The “you can’t beat ‘em, so join ‘em for sure” attitude endorsed by these women shows up in all women to a certain extent, and we who have engaged in “fratlife” have all felt that uneasy feeling of crossing a girlfriend in the name of an intimidating guy at one point or another throughout our college experience. As one woman reports:

“It makes me feel sick when I think about it now; all the [stuff] I knew was happening but still ignored or made fun of, and all the girls I threw under the bus to stay out of trouble with the guys I called my ‘friends.’ I tried to make myself believe even then that it really was girls’ faults – that skimpy outfits asked for ‘it,’ that stupid girls deserved what they got. Then of course, it happened to me, and no one believed me, and so I gave up but I couldn’t retreat. I still call them my ‘friends’ but now I know they’re not. Is that worse, actually? I don’t know…whatever….I have to stop talking about it or I really will be sick.” NOTE: this girl was not inebriated in any way, and the nausea she reports is presumably the direct results of emotions the above statement triggered.

Put — and I cannot stress this enough — very mildly, the email that “Roscoe Jenkins” (the recruitment chair of Kappa Sigma fraternity) sent around to new recruits during the fall of 2008 was absolutely and irrefutably repulsive. For those of you who were fortunate enough not to receive it in your email inboxes, it made references to all of the types of above reported situations. The statements were couched in slang language, however, such that refusal to take outward encouragement of (I would argue demands for) rapist behaviors was laughed off by the student body (with the exceptions of the women – women! – who stood behind “Roscoe Jenkins” in defense against his threatened suspension) and subsequently written off by the school administration.

I know, I know – “He is the victim of his environment” and so on. But he isn’t. He is a product, yes, but he has not been victimized. Not in a way that he can understand the depth of humiliation involved in real sexual victimization at the whim of his own peers, or in a way that has enabled him to understand with pain and regret as other victims share their similar experiences just how pervasive and real this problem is. Not in the way that a disproportionate number of women we all know and love have been and will continue to be.

That is a pretty widespread understanding stretched beyond the mental capacity or compassion of someone who can find humor in the word “skeeza” without clamping his or her jaw mid-laughter in recognition and sadness of the fact that there are millions of “skeezas” worldwide, nationwide, and right here on this campus who hate themselves and their bodies; that every “skeeza” stripped of her clothing and pinned to the ground once sat in front of princess movies or played with baby dolls and stuffed animals in imaginary worlds where they truly believed they were real people with real feelings worthy of someone else’s love, and who face the cold realization after one or more incidents separating their bodies from their selves that they were mistaken.

Any person, male or female, who can genuinely and whole-heartedly feel like ridiculing – or even ignoring, or defending – these kinds of anti-woman, hateful (and undeniably effective) sentiments regarding male treatment of sex simply does not know what they do by so doing.

Am I angry that he is still here, suspension-free and walking with our class to collect his unblemished degree? Oh yes – there are no words to describe my outrage. On the other hand, I have to recognize the fact that he unknowingly set up a very appealing plan of action to fight exactly the rape culture he tried to perpetuate. His email highlighted the administrative apathy towards the unsettling status quo (he received no punishment of any kind, appallingly enough); even more importantly, he put that very status quo into writing better and more accessibly than anyone could have ever done before him. If we ever needed proof of a hostile environment, thanks to “Roscoe Jenkins” – we have it. As recent Yale investigations have shown us, we would be – and have been – extremely ill-advised not to use it.

This story has been UPDATED to remove the name of the author of the email, based on a prior agreement he had with The Collegian in Oct. 2008. At the time, The Collegian found the issue in question to be widespread and did not deem it appropriate to publish his name of one student. The Collegian also considered that the student had not been convicted of, or found guilty of, a crime.

The columnist’s claim that the author of the email did not receive punishment is INCORRECT. The Collegian reported Nov. 13, 2008, that the University Hearing Board reprimanded the student, but did not disclose publicly the nature of the punishment.

This version also CORRECTS that the email circulated in the fall of 2008, not the spring of 2008.

Related Article Topics

, ,
Comments »
To post a comment, leave your first and last name and a valid e-mail address. Comments may not appear immediately because they must be approved by a moderator before posting. No registration is required, but you may sign in with DISQUS, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, or OpenID.
  • John Alulis

    Broadly speaking, I have not been a fan of your writing during your tenure with the Collegian, but I think that this time, we find ourselves on the same page. Excellent article and an appropriately dramatic finish for your time here.

  • Jake Morrison

    Oh look, well-written investigative journalism involving a disturbing and controversial issue relevant to students at UR. In The Collegian no less. Bravo.

  • Johanna Gehlbach

    great, great article.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770886762 Christine Parker

    Thank you for this, Fiona! An absolutely excellent way to end your Collegian career.

  • Erik Lampmann

    You’ve done a service to the school by publishing this article. Thank you for such a well-argued piece and for helping this year’s freshmen understand the seriousness of all that’s happened on this campus in the past.

    • Fiona Carmody

      Thank YOU for drawing attention to the importance of understanding!

  • Fiona Carmody

    Thanks John.

    Just an update: both men and women on this campus have contacted me over email and in person (15 women and 3 men, and counting….) to thank me for writing what they knew was true on campus, from personal experience or observation, but didn’t know how to address. 10 of these people candidly vocalized enthusiasm over the idea of filing the same Title XI claim for “hostile environment” that Yale did if nothing is done (and no administrative intent to do anything is indicated) by the upcoming fall semester – risk prevention education for women withstanding.

    I want to emphasize the fact that the article has been up for only 24 hours at this point. That’s a lot of feedback in not a lot of time.

    Looks like we’re onto something. If this article is taken down – and those involved in its contents are trying very, very hard to have this happen – I believe the case is made.

    • Fiona Carmody

      I’m sorry, Title IX, not XI. (Probably obvious, but better to be safe than sorry).

    • Fiona Carmody

      I’m sorry, Title IX, not XI. (Probably obvious, but better to be safe than sorry).

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770886762 Christine Parker

      Can you say much about that last comment – who is “those,” what are they trying to do, and why? And what can we do to help? (This is a silly, “duh” question, but all of the testimonies and experiences included in the article were printed with consent from the individuals, right? I know… definitely obvious. Just wanted to confirm for any other doubters out there!)

      • Fiona Carmody

        Actually Christine, I can’t tell you. Originally, I put people and organizations into my article by name. Interesting, right?

        • Fiona Carmody

          Woops, I thought this comment didn’t go up and rewrote it all in one post. Anyway, now it’s essentially up twice so….I guess you get the idea! :-)

      • Fiona Carmody

        Hey Christine,

        Yes, I conducted “formal” (but casual) interviews, so I could ask interviewees to indicate to me exactly what I could put in and what I couldn’t – which is frankly too bad, in some ways (myself included, I took some of my own experiences out), because the most horrific or recent stories had to be taken out. Don’t worry – I do not violate that kind of trust, ever. Especially not on dangerous topics like this I hope that assuages the doubt you encountered.

        Thanks for offering your help (I’ll let you know). And no, unfortunately, I can’t tell you who “those” are; I originally named them in my article, but they were subsequently taken out (there’s a disclaimer at the bottom that vaguely explains why).

        • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770886762 Christine Parker

          Fiona,

          With regards to the interviews, that’s what I figured. Thanks for clarifying!

          And I completely understand with regards to the details of the situation. Keep on fighting, and know that you have a whole army of readers ready for you to call upon us! :)

          • Fiona Carmody

            Thanks – I know. ;)

    • Fiona Carmody

      I guess they can’t take it down, so it will stay up. I guess this because of that new blurb with caps: INCORRECT, about something completely unimportant to my point. First of all, until someone wants to tell me what terrible punishment it was that this guy had to suffer through, I’m unconvinced. Second of all, most of campus believes exactly what I said in this article, meaning any punishment that incurred has been so well hidden it has escaped CAMPUS GOSSIP (and very, very little escapes that); that perpetuates a hostile environment just as much as no punishment does. Third of all, the hostile environment was exactly my point, and this case is still evidence.

      • Fiona Carmody

        Fourth of all, I have been notified by more than 5 people that their comments were censored.

  • Fiona Carmody

    Thanks John.

    Just an update: both men and women on this campus have contacted me over email and in person (15 women and 3 men, and counting….) to thank me for writing what they knew was true on campus, from personal experience or observation, but didn’t know how to address. 10 of these people candidly vocalized enthusiasm over the idea of filing the same Title XI claim for “hostile environment” that Yale did if nothing is done (and no administrative intent to do anything is indicated) by the upcoming fall semester – risk prevention education for women withstanding.

    I want to emphasize the fact that the article has been up for only 24 hours at this point. That’s a lot of feedback in not a lot of time.

    Looks like we’re onto something. If this article is taken down – and those involved in its contents are trying very, very hard to have this happen – I believe the case is made.

  • Grant Gibbs

    No doubt what you say is pretty much the truth…While Greek life may have its benefits for members, it most definitely creates an environment of adverse selection on campus.

    Many of the threats you highlighted as being used to manipulate women have to do with social collusion as a means of coercion. That that’s the whole point of traditional Frats- to accumulate enough of the attractive and wealthy-born men on campus to significantly restrict the options of women on the dating market.

    While sororities function similarly, they don’t throw enough parties to affect the dating scene. Perhaps they should start, and in doing so even the playing field.

    I wish I could say eliminating Greek life would solve the problem…but it wouldn’t. There will always be social hierarchies, with the associated problems.

    • Fiona Carmody

      My first reaction upon my recognition of this problem was to address the issue of sorority/fraternity sameness (for lack of better phrasing), particularly with regard to the lodges. While sororities are getting new houses next year (I believe they differ from the lodges in that they are residential, although I could be wrong), sorority members nationwide are actually not allowed to serve alcohol in affiliation with the sorority they are in. This national policy manifests itself in 3 ways at our school, as far as I know (NOTE: I have noticed that sororities at other schools break the rules more, but I would guess that has more to do with population camouflage on bigger campuses): 1) Sorority women must have a 3rd venue serve alcohol for any event at which they would like alcohol served (this is where “mixers” and “socials” come in, with frats and outside venues to mediate, respectively); 2) Sorority women cannot wear sorority clothing or affiliate any other indicator of their sorority membership with the party scene (i.e. cannot wear sorority shirts out, have sorority paraphernalia in the background of facebook pictures depicting alcohol consumption, etc…I think this deteriorates a certain sense of bonding in some ways and contexts, but I can see how that might be perceived as a bit far-fetched); and 3) Sorority women are reprimanded and penalized by their chapter honor boards (if the national code is followed by their chapter) for being too intoxicated in sorority contexts (socials, etc). I have heard of #3 happening for girls seen as too intoxicated outside of sorority events as well.

      That’s sort of a supersized explanation of the uneven playing field, but anyway – there you have it. There might always be social hierarchies, but there will not always be sexual assault. I agree with you – I don’t think eliminating Greek life would help the problem either (although a few regulations could obviously be changed). I do think it could be used to mandate certain types of education, but that’s not to say that there aren’t other ways as well. If you end up thinking about it more and have any ideas, please let me know.

  • Alex Vlasic

    Thank you!

  • Ralitza Dionissieva

    University of Richmond can use a reality check. Thank you for this article.

  • Jan van den Bos

    Thank you for addressing the tremendously important problems of sexual assault of women by men, verbal and physical humiliation of women by men, and the existence of a patriarchal culture in which women are dehumanized. Your story provides shocking evidence to how real these problems are on our campus, and I hope it will cause anyone who reads it to reflect on the need for activism in order to change certain accepted patterns of behavior.

    It is incredibly sad and frustrating that women are verbally, physically and sexually violated while the problems remain unaddressed and the violator (and cultural consensus) seem to be indifferent or ignorant. Therefore, I want to applaud you for writing a story that reaches out to vulnerable victims and women in general, and strongly approve of your mission to change the way we think about this.

    I do think that the Collegian made a huge and unforgivable mistake by printing the name (and initially publishing it online) of the author of the email. Collegian writers choose to have their names displayed publicly, but the author of the email did not. No matter how much you feel that this person deserves some form of punishment, there is something incredibly risky about accusing someone in public of something so severe, while at the same time making known to the entire world who exactly it is that you are targeting.

    Do you really want this individual to be haunted by this for his entire life? Do you really want him to receive numerous weird messages and hateful emails? Do you really want to damage his chances of finding a job, perhaps preventing him from doing what he loves for the rest of his life? Do you really want all his relatives, now and in the future, to be able to read this just by googling his name? Could you not have contacted him in person to address your concerns, while writing this piece without mentioning his full name?

    By mistakenly stating that the author of the email did not receive any form of punishment, it appears that you have not taken the effort to ask him how he looks back on the entire situation. If he do not wishes to comment on the situation, logical thinking suggests that there are reasons why it would not be pleasant to have to go through this again during finals week/graduation, after having had this experience years ago. In my opinion, this particular email received a disproportional amount of attention: not because the issue is not incredibly important (please don’t get me wrong!), not because the writer wasn’t incredibly disrespectful, but because one individual was put on the spotlight and was trialled with everyone on campus knowing about it. Sure, an adequate response is justified. This includes punishment for the author of the email, which happened. No matter what you think of the severity of that punishment, what makes you think that it would help anyone if you used your platform in the collegian to publish the name of that student? I would like to ask you to reflect on the impact that that might have on somebody’s life, and how strange it must be to go through this, particularly after having been threatened with expulsion from this university for sending out an email in the past.

    I condemn the contents of the email, but think that it is out of proportion and uncalled for to attempt to eternally link the person behind the email to that one email he wrote. By publishing a full name, you’re identifying a person and not the misdoings of that person. I think that if you had recalled how wrong that email was, your article could have been equally as effective, and it would have read as a genuine call to awareness and activism rather than like a story of personal prosecution. You don’t help victims by creating new victims. The author of the email too, deserves the chance to change, to redeem himself, to be able to start anew at some point.

    If you hadn’t published the full name of the author of the email, this would have been one of the most impressive collegian articles I’ve ever read. Again, I think it is terrific that you are addressing these problems, but think that you went too far by including the person’s full name. I’m also very surprised that the Collegian publishes the names of unknowing students in such a sensitive context, with the impact on that person’s life possibly being very significant. Even if the Collegian considers it somehow justified, I think it’s incredibly wrong not to contact the student beforehand.

    I would regret it if my comment distracts people from the actual message of the article, but felt it necessary to defend the right to privacy of my fellow student. For anyone who has bothered to read this entire comment, please join the author of this article in her efforts to make our campus a safe environment for everyone, and please consider the impact your actions can have on the sense of safety of others.

    • Fiona Carmody

      Thank you for your post.

      My response to some of your questions might be too controversial to what I take as your position if given, and 1) I understand that he is your friend and you care about his well-being, and want to avoid personal conflict on that front (there might be some fundamental disagreements) and 2) do not want to detract attention from the focal point, which the email incident – and the way it was handled – serves as evidence of. I am therefore going to leave them unanswered. I will point out that The Collegian editorial staff has taken the names out of the article, and did so a very short time after the article was initially posted; the emailer doesn’t need to worry about the Google-search issue.

      Thanks again for posting, and for being so careful and fair in your approach – I really appreciate the effort. I’m glad we can agree on the central problem.

    • Melanie Watkins

      Although Fiona chose not to respond to specific points you made in your comment regarding her article, I feel the need to address a couple of the issues you mentioned. I am personally disappointed in the fact that the name of the author who wrote the leaked email was retracted so quickly from the article. This is not because I particularly want bad things to happen to the individual who wrote it, but because of the significance it would have in holding him personally responsible. By identifying the individual who wrote the email (by name), it sends a message to ALL men that if you do choose to engage in this “frat culture” which encourages homo-social bonding around the sexual victimization of women, you better be ready to accept the consequences. Those who CHOOSE to endorse and perpetuate a culture that systematically exploits women causing irreversible trauma (not only for those women, but also for the men who will love them later in life), will UNQUESTIONABLY be held PERSONALLY responsible in doing so, and will be forced to suffer serious and long-term consequences.

      Also, I was disappointed in (although not surprised by) all the questions directed toward the author of this article such as,… “Do you really want him to receive numerous weird messages and hateful emails? Do you really want to damage his chances of finding a job, perhaps preventing him from doing what he loves for the rest of his life? Do you really want all his relatives, now and in the future, to be able to read this just by googling his name?”

      Although I understand that these questions are coming from a place of concern for “Roscoe Jenkins”, it seemed all too familiar to the tactics used to prevent victims of sexual assault from reporting their offenders. However in response to these questions, although I cannot speak for Fiona, my answer is “no, I do not want this for HIM”.
      Now… do I want this aforementioned fate for ANY man who teaches other men that it is OK to sexually assault women? “Oh, you bet I do”.

      I am not trying to say that the author of the email is a “bad person”. I honestly doubt that he is. I think he is probably very much like the majority of guys out there, which is the exact problem. I know there are many men reading this who cannot honestly say that there have not been questionable times when they have pushed boundaries and had sexual intercourse with a girl KNOWING she was too drunk to consent… or even have pushed alcohol on a girl that he was interested in having sex with because she would be more likely to consent if she were to be drunk. Do I think that men who have done this are BAD men? No, I do not. I imagine I likely have male friends, possibly family members, and even male professors who are all guilty of sexually victimizing women at one point in their lives. Do I think that makes it excusable? Absolutely not. Do I WANT these men that I care about to be humiliated and be convicted of a crime? Obviously, I do not. Do I think that JUST because I have never witnessed what they are capable of, the women they have exploited do not deserve justice? Of course not. Do I think that they should have necessary legal action taken against them? Yes, I do.

      There needs to be a clear message that is sent to guys that this is NOT OK. If a man acts this way, he will be forced to suffer the consequences. Allowing men to believe that they will suffer no repercussions for doing things such as inebriating a girl to the point where she might say “yes” when the answer has ALWAYS been ‘no”, is NEVER OK. Men are often times unaware that what they are doing is even all THAT wrong. The cycle keeps being perpetuated and the lines get blurred because we always come to the defense of the offender arguing that “it’s unfair” because the lines were blurred of what was just “morally wrong” and “what would get them in trouble”. The way to break this cycle is UNBLUR these lines by holding these men personally accountable and to (without hesitation) punish those who act in victimizing ways.

      Lastly, I would like to address something. We think of this email in abstract terms. However, can you say with COMPLETE certainty that the author of that email has not aided in a sexual assault on campus in other ways? Can you be absolutely sure that that VERY email did not result in some pledge (desperate for the social status that comes with belonging to a fraternity) making it a point of going out and committing sexual assault against a girl (who otherwise might never have been sexually victimized), all because “that is what fraternity brothers do”. In which case, the author of that email should feel lucky that he is not being held legally responsible as an accomplice to rape. I most certainly believe if an authority figure pressures those he has power over (socially or physically) to act in sexually violent ways, he is being an accomplice to sexual assault.

      But wait… that’s ridiculous! Some kid reads THAT email, goes out and sexually assaults a girl, and somehow the author of AN EMAIL is to blame?!? The author of the email did not MAKE that kid sexually assault that girl, that boy did that of his own free will. The pledge who raped someone should be punished, not someone who only just endorsed it.

      My point exactly. Even though we live in a culture that produces men who sexually victimize women, sexual assault remains INEXCUSABLE . Although I agree that society-at-large is what is perpetuating this culture centered around the exploitation of women, EVERYONE is STILL responsible for their own actions. EVERY man on this campus is in control of what he CHOOSES to support and what he CHOOSES NOT TO, as well as the crimes he CHOOSES to commit, and those that he does NOT. I think I speak for every woman at University of Richmond (at least those who have responded positively to this article) that instead of boys who feel they need to have sex with women (by any means necessary) in order to gain status with other males, the University of Richmond needs some quality MEN. Men who are secure enough to reject a culture centered around boys who desperately and pathetically attempt to assert their masculinity, as well as their sexual and social dominance, by victimizing women.

  • Melanie Watkins

    In sum: administration began the appropriate response, but then cowered when other offenders and ignorant bystanders jumped to his defense. At least administration sent a CLEAR message to victims of (campus) sexual assault (whether they be victims before the kappa sig email, made victims since, or those who will be victimized in the future), as well those “men” who commit sexual assault on this campus (those who had before, those did afterwards, and those who will in the future) that:

    Westhampton women, we acknowledge that the possibility you’ll get sexually assaulted in a place where most of you call ‘home’ is pretty high… but (let’s just be honest) if it happens to you, you probably don’t want to say anything because we care more about possible future alumni contributions that we do about protecting the female population, or advocating for 1/4th of that population who has already been victimized.

    Richmond college Men: Sexual assault is unacceptable… well, unless you’re either rich, white, or in a frat (best if you’re all three!)… then NBD. However, if our efforts to silence women somehow fail (but really, how could they?) we may begin disciplinary action or send out an email saying that there has been “a reported sexual assault on campus” (but we’ll COMPLETELY back away at the first sign of opposition… *hint hint*). But don’t worry, we’ll stick by you in the end… we just need to do something to appease those drunk sluts that had it coming

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770886762 Christine Parker

      Melanie, your fabulous sassiness made me laugh SO hard.

      But then I realized it’s actually all completely true…

  • Ryan Erickson-Kulas

    Great article! I only wish the whole article had been printed in the Collegian.

  • Crystal Thornhill

    This article is great! Very well said!

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Diane-Stevenson/688730239 Diane Stevenson

    Thank you for bringing up this issue again!

    Not only is it something that was poorly dealt with at the time, but as you’ve said nothing has been done since then and the issue entirely disappeared from the public view.

    This is obviously a huge issue on any campus, but the fact that this email (which I vividly remember) and all of the other incidents you’ve described here have gone unpunished, for all intents and purposes, is something that, as a member of Westhampton college, completely scares me. Should I be scared that my university’s policies don’t protect me or any of my friends, or your friends? No. But I am.

    I personally think that is the telling message in your article and I really want to thank you again for putting this out before you graduate!!!

  • Haley Jones

    Thank you for the article, Fiona.
    Here’s a scenario for the people who still think that girls in skimpy clothes and drinking a lot at parties are “asking for it”:
    Girl is in her room with her friends before a party. She goes through her closet, selects two outfits, and holds them up one at a time to her girlfriends. “I want to send the message that I want to get raped tonight,” she says. “Which shirt would be better? And how many beers do you think that’ll take to make me look vulnerable?”
    Sounds ridiculous? That’s because it is. Victim blaming has to stop.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Katherine-Schmidt/509342010 Katherine Schmidt

    Thank you, Fiona

  • Megan Molnar

    Before anyone berates me, I AM NOT VICTIM BLAMING. There is absolutely no excuse for the rape culture perpetuated at this school and all across the country. There is no excuse for sick men who think that non-consent means yes. Women do not “ask for it” by dressing a certain way, and there is NO excuse for what’s happened. NONE.

    Now, because we do live somewhere where this happens, women need to be responsible. Be mindful, be careful with alcohol. Be aware of what it does to you. A recent study stated that 90% of rapes on college campuses occurred when one or both parties was under the influence of alcohol. Be careful, be responsible. Unfortunately, as of right now, we as women are not safe.

    The fact that I even have to say this is a sad fact on this campus

    Great article, Fiona.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=770886762 Christine Parker

      Such a tough situation to straddle. Women shouldn’t have to worry about guarding their drinks or not drinking too much… in an ideal world. But we don’t live in that world. And if we begin to act as if we lived in such a utopia – even on a mass scale – I fear that may only exacerbate the problem.

      Solution: Talk to men.

      Check out Jackson Katz’s “Tough Guise” video for some awesome information:

      and…

      Check out Andrea Gibson’s poem “Blue Blanket” – it’s truly inspiring:

      • Fiona Carmody

        i just cannot believe that jackson was here and so few people went. you would think organizations – particularly men’s given the topic of violence in masculinity – would have been REQUIRED to go.

      • Anonymous

        I liked that a lot. Thank you for posting it. Katz is a genius. Please post some more of these if you know of them.

    • Anonymous

      You are victim blaming all the way.

      “A recent study stated that 90% of rapes on college campuses occurred when one or both parties was under the influence of alcohol.” So you are saying that women need to more accountable of their own actions prior to rape? No, that’s part and parcel of what constitutes victim blaming.

      Take some WGSS classes, since you need to know that it is never okay to place neither blame NOR RESPONSIBILITY on potential rape victims.

  • D Rasheed Nazeri

    Thanks for bringing attention once again to what is a sad and disgraceful aspect of the “social scene” on college campuses all over.

    I was a student at UR when the 2008 incident happened; it created a shitstorm that ultimately amounted to no more than a bandaid solution to what is a problem of epidemic proportions; it was more a PR stunt than a real, comprehensive initiative to counter and reduce–if not eliminate–such incidents and attitudes.

    Perhaps we ought to reconsider what has become accepted–and tolerated–in the social scene; what we consider “fun” and “having a good time.” And while the main responsibility for these criminal and inhumane acts fall on the men who commit them, the university, the rest of student body–both men and women–and even parents need to work to prevent and eliminate them.

    An honest recognition of the problem is a good start. We would have to take concrete steps and invest resources if we are serious about fighting and solving it, however. A “bias response team” ain’t it.

    • Anonymous

      You’re absolutely right! The “bias response team” has become somewhat of a humorous meme at UR.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1234710145 Jessie Pascarelli

    I am reminded forcibly of the poem that Andrea Gibson performed a few months ago and that Christine Parker appropriately read at Take Back the Night…”she’s not asking what you’re gonna tell your daughter
    she asking what you’re gonna teach your son.”

    The attitude toward sexual assault has become “Don’t get raped”–why not, “Don’t rape”? Men on campus, and specifically those in fraternities, need to understand the hurt and shame that such actions perpetuate. Remember when fraternities and sororities were required to go to Take Back the Night–that one time? Sensitivity training and attendance at such events should be required to maintain their charter. Taking away their lodges is the only way to get their attention and force them to see the female side of the story.

    • Fiona Carmody

      I know. It’s so difficult to make people listen to something they don’t know why they don’t want to listen to.