Obama’s treatment of Israel unfair, dangerous

Published: April 1, 2010, 1:38 am ET
Richmond '10

This week, we witnessed President Obama’s shameful treatment of the leader of one of America’s closest allies. This became clear when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was hauled before a “seething” Obama and read the Riot Act behind closed doors. Netanyahu was rudely dismissed and the press was not allowed to photograph even a single handshake between the two men.

Obama has shown a willingness to bow to foreign dictators, and has entertained the notion of talks with murderous tyrants such as Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Cuba’s Raul Castro. The democratic state whose U.N. voting record is most consistent with America’s was treated like a burden.

The flagellation of the leader of the only democracy in the Middle East that guarantees political, civil and human rights to every single one of its citizens regardless of religion, race, sexual orientation and socio-economic status, does not bode well for the promotion of American values worldwide. It exposes a dangerous and worrisome vein of Obama’s foreign policy.

There was admittedly a lack of oversight on behalf of the Israeli government when the Interior Ministry announced the construction of 1,600 new housing units in the Jewish East Jerusalem neighborhood of Ramat Shlomo during a visit by Vice President Joe Biden in early March. Prime Minister Netanyahu, known as Bibi in Israel, has now apologized four times for the timing of the incident, while the Obama administration has continued its verbal assault on Israel, culminating in the widely reported bullying of Bibi this past week.

While allies can disagree, it is common sense that in order to ensure the credibility of the American security guarantee, their disagreements should be discussed in private.

Further American criticism has focused on the suspected Israeli assassination of Hamas arms-smuggler Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai. I ask the reader to imagine that the United States has carried out a successful assassination of Osama bin Laden in a foreign country. Who would criticize this action? The answer, simply put, is almost no state except for a small mélange of reactionary and despotic regimes under the guise of “sovereignty.”

The chorus of voices denouncing Israel’s suspected assassination of al-Mabhouh is composed not only of these rogue states, but of Western states such as the United Kingdom, Australia and Ireland. This shows the double standard to which Israel is held every day. No other country faces such intense scrutiny for its efforts to protect the security and well-being of its citizens. According to independent sources, no other country performs so ethically in the execution of necessary combat operations.

The next time you feel the need to criticize Israel because your friend has an “End the Gaza Seige” button on their backpack, or because you heard Rachel Maddow pick apart the state’s unwillingness to bend to Obama’s every whim, put yourself in its shoes:

The state of Israel, about the size of New Jersey, with 7.5 million citizens, is surrounded by hostile Arab dictatorships whose populations number almost 300 million.

If Israel’s civilian victims of terrorism are made proportionate to the American population, Israel has suffered the equivalent of 17 Sept. 11 attacks since the year 2000.

Only two Arab states recognize the existence of the state of Israel. American allies who benefit from the good will of the American taxpayer do not recognize Israel’s existence. This list includes Afghanistan, Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, among others.

If Israel’s neighbors are not engaged in public attempts to delegitimize the state of Israel, through proposing and sponsoring U.N. investigations and condemnations, they are actively aiding the enemies of Israel by arming groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah. Both groups are considered terrorist groups by the U.S. Department of State.

Israel seeks peace and security in a dangerous and hostile neighborhood. An almost obsessive emphasis on Israel’s faults, particularly prevalent among the college campuses of America, is readily apparent today. Meanwhile, the Arab world, which lacks a single democracy, receives a free pass for flagrant and chronic human rights abuses. This blatant contradiction is often nothing more than a poorly disguised form of political anti-Semitism.

The American people are wondering why Obama has carried out such harsh treatment to the one state that stands by America without fail, and whose values are so consistent with the American worldview. The President must unequivocally reaffirm America’s commitment to Israel’s security and must do so promptly, before lasting damage affects the credibility of the American brand abroad and Israel’s existence.

Professor Alan M. Dershowitz said recently at the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee annual policy conference, to which the author of this letter was an attendee: “If the terrorists laid down their arms tomorrow, there would be peace; if Israel laid down its arms tomorrow, there would be genocide.”

Comments »
To post a comment, leave your first and last name and a valid e-mail address. Comments may not appear immediately because they must be approved by a moderator before posting. No registration is required, but you may sign in with DISQUS, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, or OpenID.
  • Anonymous

    Points of contention with your article:

    Bibi has to keep apologizing because Israel doesn’t realize that it’s not the TIMING of the announcement but the substance.

    Israel’s citizens have equal rights (not true), great, how about the population that’s been under occupation and siege for over 40 years?

    Israel has been offered legitimacy by many Arab states, and refuses it because to do so would end the occupation, which is not in Israel’s right-wing interests.

    Essentially, your article reads like simple-minded propaganda, with little basis in the realities of the situation. If we criticize Israel, it’s because Israel’s actions are not in its best interests, and while the people of Israel know this, the government seems to bow to every settler whim (see the recent hoopla re: the ER in Ashkelon). If you love Israel, demand peace. Any other option simply ensures more dead Israelis, many, many more dead Palestinians, global isolation and the eventual end of Israel as a Jewish, democratic country.

  • Grant Gibbs

    lol…one more person on the long list of people who Obama has essentially given the middle finger.

    Excellent Article. The Collegian needs more geopolitical articles, and world news in general.

  • Anonymous

    Of course the author won’t tell you that Israel is pursuing a colonial occupation of Palestinian territories. An occupation that has nothing to do with the safety of Israel, Gaza. Nothing but an organized effort to disposes the Palestinian people. Why would he do that, because that would expose the charade of “poor Israel”

  • Kweku Adjaloo

    Israel deserves no pity from any sane, rational and God fearing human. That country treats Palestinians as if they are not God created humans. Stealing Palestinian lands and ‘slapping’ the Vice-President of the United States are not acts to be condoned by any normal thinking human being. America uses tax payers’ money to arm and feed Israel and what do we get in return–nothing! Our children, brothers, friends, fathers etc, are made to fight (and die) against the muslims on behalf of Israel. And what do we get in return–nothing!

    What people are forgetting is that both Israelis and Palestinians are children of Abraham, and therefore, belong to the semitic race (descendants of Shem). However, we treat the Palestinians (both Christians and Muslims) as if they are not humans. We call Palestinian terrorists by their right name, and call Jewish terrorists ‘extremists.’ Who are we deceiving? And when right-thinking, God fearing and moralists express opinion on the sins and atrocities that Israelis are committing against Palestinians, they are called anti-semites. Oh how I wish for the day of judgement! When the hypocrites and liers will be exposed and undefended Palestinians will finally have justice delivered by the Creator himself—- in eternity.

    • laura blaylock

      You are officially a idiot!!

  • mallen

    Israel isn’t quite as simple and innocent as “the only democracy in the Middle East and a true and great ally of the U.S.” Israel has an occupations you didn’t mention. It has had that occupation of stateless people for over 40 years. There is going to be a democratic nightmare for Israel in less than two decades. And Israel hardly listens to the U.S. Israel is lead by far right wing politicians that would be considered fringe in America. EXAMPLE Avigdor Lieberman! American policy for those 40 years has been that settlements are illegal and that they make a lasting peace impossible. Israel can’t and should not take American money, weapons, and diplomatic support, then give us the middle finger when it comes to U.S. interests!!

  • Ashley Andem

    I don't support what Israel is doing in the slightest; I also think that President Obama wasn't harsh enough.

    There were Arab inhabitants in what Israel seeks to reclaim, and the soldiers will do anything to push them out. There are parts of Gaza and elsewhere already overtaken by Israeli “settlers” who move into homes previously belonging to someone else. Soldiers will routinely invade some Arab families' homes, demanding they show extensive proof that they have a right to live there, regardless of the fact that whole generations have held that house in their possession. In other cases, if families aren't attacked by Israeli settlers, the soldiers put insurmountable amounts of pressure on them to find another place to live.

    And instead of working to live peacefully with Arab neigbhours, as they claim, Israel is doing much to make outsiders unwelcome. I find it interesting that the nationally-hailed Symphonic orchestra is essentially the backdrop to the selective evaporation of a people.

    American news companies do not broadcast what really happens in Gaza, Palestinian borders or even within the state of Israel, because blind support of Israel is considered the default. Your article is one-sided, and I find your typecasting of the crisis there if not offensive, incomplete at best.

    • Dan Letovsky

      Why are you saying things that aren't true?

      There are no Israeli settlers in the Gaza strip. Israel unilaterally withdrew from the Gaza strip in 2007. This means that they forcefully expelled Israeli Jewish settlers in the lands outside of Gaza city and within the city proper.

      This is not a rarity; it is the traditional thing for Israel to do in occupied territories when they feel their security is guaranteed. Please see also withdrawal from Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, when thousands of Israeli settlers were also brought back to Israel from this formerly occupied war possession. This is why Prime Minister Netanyahu in a 2009 speech endorsed a Palestinian state, and promised a one year freeze on settlement construction within the West Bank.

      This is why Israel's government is currently considering negotiations with the government of Syria for the return of the occupied Golan Heights. These are strategic lands that were used by the Syrian dictator Haffez al-Assad to bomb thousands of innocent Israeli civilians until it was captured in 1967 by Israel.

      It would appear to me that Israel not only has every intention of removing all settlers from its occupied territories, but is well on its way towards accomplishing this objective. Even at the expense of their security, I might add.

      And, where have I engaged in typecasting? Every fact I say is patently true – there is not a single democracy in the Arab world. I've lived and studied there, in three countries. There is no freedom.

      Have you been to Israel? If you have, I can't imagine how you would ever be able to honestly make the statement that “Israel is doing much to make outsiders unwelcome.”

      Israel's parliament, the Knesset, is one of the most diverse parliamentary bodies in the world. Arab-Israelis, who enjoy full Israeli citizenship, voting rights, and social services, make up almost a third of the population of Israel.

      I challenge you to name me one place in the Middle East where every citizen is guaranteed their civil rights, security, and dignity. Excluding Israel, you can't.

      I also challenge you to name your sources for attacks by Israeli settlers that are more lethal and frequent than attacks by Palestinians on Israeli citizens.

      And I would argue that American coverage has been rather fair – look at the New York Times' substantial reporting on the Goldstone Report, a paper which has been criticized by almost every legitimate American judicial society for its hidden political agenda and the conflict of interest of the Jewish South African Judge Richard Goldstone.

      If you'd like to discuss this in person I'd be happy to

      • Anonymous

        Dan, you are not being honest here. When u talk about Occupied Territories you are not mentioning West Bank , where Israel has continued to purposefully expropriate Palestinian lands. Secondly, most of the Gazan settlers where not brought back to Israel, rather they were given homes in the illegal settlements of the West Bank.

        Also, there is no serious consideration of any negotiations with Syria. The plain wording of your statement “considering negotiations” shows the wiggle room you have left for yourself in this false statement.

        Israel has displayed no such an intention of removing all settlers from Occupied territories. It is still building settlements. Most recently in East Jerusalem, an area considered by the entire world “occupied”, despite what Netenyahu states.

        Democracy in Israel, is very selective. Israeli Arabs are at best third class citizens of that country. And what about the Palestinians. They have no voting rights. Yet another point you have conveniently glossed over.

        People like Dershowitz, who u have quoted, are nothing more than propagandists and apologists for the apartheid that exists in Israel today. Their only role is to shout down anyone who questions Israeli treatment of Palestinians.

    • Dan Letovsky

      And this definitely was not meant to explain the crisis there.

      It is simply expressing views on one single incident – President Obama's shameful treatment of a close ally.

      It would not be possible within such a short space, nor do I possess the hubris necessary to attempt to explain the conflict in a single article.

      Who would be so presumptuous as to assume this could be done? People have devoted their lives to studying this topic.

      • Jake Morrison

        Geez when did it become so we can't express displeasure with an allies' actions on a specific issue without getting ripped apart and accused of betraying them? Even Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill didn't agree on anywhere close to everything. The United States opposes the continued construction of settlements because it is in the interests of advancing peace talks to do so and stopping construction in East Jerusalem really wouldn't hurt Israel in the long term for now. Israel mistimed its announcement of new constructions. We expressed our displeasure. To not do so would have made us appear weak and inconsistent in the eyes of the Palestinians and Middle Eastern countries. Since the “crisis” the administration has repeatedly reaffirmed its commitment to Israel. There is no crisis. Just disagreement. Allies do not and should not agree on everything, just as friends and married couples don't agree on everything, and expressing our displeasure with Israel's actions on an issue is not tantamount to supporting terrorism.

        We have a situation where Israel has a very conservative government, and we have a more left leaning one. There are going to be disagreements. That doesn't mean our alliance is in danger. Stop the fearmongering.

        As for the extra scrutiny the author perceives Israel as getting, just remember that this is the country we supply with billions in aid and weapons and give a guarantee of military protection. In other words, we have a vested interest in Israel and its actions. And moving the peace process forward between Israel and Palestine is one of Obama's top priorities. So expect to hear more about the issues surrounding that than about human rights in Syria. Just the way it works. We can't do everything.

        So to summarize, it does not strengthen our alliance with Israel for us to simply ignore the disagreeable things they do and constantly praise the agreeable. A strong alliance necessarily has some disagreements, and ours is no different. If the author wants to debate whether stopping settlements is a necessary, or at least acceptable, precondition to peace talks, thats fine, but to suggest that Obama has somehow permanently damaged our alliance is complete and utter bs that just continues to play on the whole “Obama hates Israel” lies stirred up during the election as a companion to the “Obama is a Muslim” ones.

        • Grant Gibbs

          It is a generally agreed upon leadership principal that when dealing with colleagues, you criticize in private and praise in public.

          Obama could have taken Netanyahu into a room and screamed at him, and it wouldn't have been a problem. The public humiliation which he subjected Netanyahu to is not constructive in any way, and will make the Israelis think twice about whether they should share intelligence with us.

          • Jake Morrison

            With all due respect, the only reason any of this was brought into the public square was because Israel completely embarrassed Joe Biden and the United States by announcing new settlements publicly on the day he arrived to talk privately about a settlement freeze we were pushing.

      • Ashley Andem

        What would be the value of meeting you, in person, to discuss this? It isn't going to stop me from publicly challenging this article.

        Additionally, having engaged in discourse on this matter with Palestinian and Israeli nationals, I can say with confidence that what I present is accurate. Quite a bit of information is available in the following locations, and I have posted links to direct illustrations to what I alluded to in my first response. Of course, I'm fully prepared for you to refute the quality and lean of some of the websites, seeing as their original posting languages aren't English and definitely aren't American-written:

        http://electronicintifada.net/v2/article11120.s
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bachir_Gemayel#Isr
        http://coteret.com/2010/02/24/tel-aviv-presents
        http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/962767.html
        http://www.adalah.org/eng/
        http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1104621.html
        http://english.aljazeera.net/news/middleeast/20

        While the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is complex and people have dedicated years to studying it, gathering information to balance (or level) an article takes a considerably shorter stretch of time. It is far more dangerous, I would say, to blindly support an “ally” country just because government officials have traditionally declared them bedfellows. To do such without paying attention to the human rights infringements at hand is deleterious to the already-disintegrating American reputation abroad.

        • http://twitter.com/capitalistchaos Dan Letovsky

          You should really read about the Goldstone Report and the biased jurisprudence with which Justice Goldstone approached Israel's use of force during Operation Cast Lead, as well as the reasons behind Israel's operation(s) in Lebanon including '82 and 2006, before you toss a bunch of Wikipedia articles and blog posts from E Intifada. So I do question the legitimacy of those sources.

          Most legal societies in the United States have questioned the integrity of the process used by Justice Goldstone, and have accused him of bias. He is also documented to have been on the board of Human Rights Watch, for several weeks, while conducting his investigation for the U.N.

          While I admire the work HRW performs in other areas of the world, such as Latin America, their Middle East staff unfortunately displays some rabid anti-Israel tendencies. A HRW employee was actually fired after it was discovered he was an avid collector of neo-Nazi uniforms and would routinely dress up in WWII Nazi uniforms, while posting online in anti-semitic websites. So many people have questioned Goldstone's integrity.

          On the topic of Al Jazeera, while I do benefit a lot from reading AJ English, their English version is highly sanitized. If you would ask an arabic speaker to read to you some articles from Aljazeera.net, you'd probably be shocked at the common words used for, and pictures to illustrate, Jews and Americans.

          I want to make it clear to everyone that I don't support blindly following Israel. I think there is room for criticism here, but it should be done in private, because larger issues threaten Israel's security.

          While we debate the merits of one housing unit here or another one there, Iran is within a year of building nuclear weapons which they have the means to deliver to Israel, either through ballistic missiles or by handing them off to a proxy such as Hamas. President Ahmadinejad of Iran has called Israel a “one-bomb country.”

          • Ashley Andem

            Letovsky, while I appreciate the gesture, I already read the Arabic Al Jazeera. I gave you an English link more or less for your benefit. And unless you speak and write Arabic fluently (and can hence translate for yourself), I'll pass on the assertion that they're biased.

            “He is also documented to have been on the board of Human Rights Watch, for several weeks, while conducting his investigation for the U.N.”

            Having such a position is what adds credence to the report. I should add that, for most people who sought to tar and feather Goldstone, antisemitism also applies to voices of dissent against Israel. And of course, if those “many people” who criticise Goldstone are American, this surprises me little. When truth is revealed, it only makes sense that the exposed will do whatever it takes to silence it.

            Israel is a bully to Palestine; your lack of comment on any of the other articles I posted indicate some level of agreement, does it not? And so, it is not entirely at risk to the “big-bad-Arab Nations” you so describe in your article. It -would- be in American interests to slam Israel's Arab neighbours, because we want to ensure that our arms trade with them isn't disturbed by a potential partnership elsewhere. We will never agree in terms of whether criticism should be made public or kept in private: I believe that any state is open to criticism of varying degrees, especially if their activity proves detrimental to others. To mumble in private about Israeli affairs is to give consent to their activity; it is the same as blindly supporting them in the public eye.

            Israel is breaching on committing genocide. I think that's cause for public admonition, don't you?

          • David Lustovitz

            Palestine isn't a nation, Ashley.

          • Ashley Andem

            If that's the most you could possibly contribute to a dead discussion, I apologise on your behalf.

            Secondly, I admit I used the wrong term. Although, Israel is a state established on Palestinian territory and has been usurping more land ever since. If you wanted to get technical, it IS Palestine.

    • Edwin

      Ashley,

      What are you talking about? You are dead wrong, there are NO settlers in Gaza.

  • Rory Quinlan

    Dan, although I largely agree with you, I think you are showing some bias.

    First off, calling the president's treatment of Netanyahu as “anti-semitism” is out of line. As Americans we are if anything biased toward Jews over Arabs in this situation, because we share so much in common with Israel. No nation is innocent in this Middle East conflict.

    Also, saying Israeli Arabs constitute “almost a third of the population” is a fairly blatant skewing of the facts. Arabs make up about a fifth of Israeli citizen.

    Great article, just playing the devil's advocate.

    • http://twitter.com/capitalistchaos Dan Letovsky

      Rory – Obama’s actions aren’t anti-semitic at all. I wasn’t saying that.

      Who I was accusing of a potential anti-semitic bias is Great Britain and some other European countries. The UK in the past year has issued arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, expelled top Israeli diplomats, and their parliament has issued a voluminous stream of consciousness haranguing of Israeli defensive actions.

      Is it a coincidence that Britain has one of the largest and fastest growing Islamic populations in Europe?

      Is it a coincidence that the single demographic among whom there is almost 100% agreement that Israel is a nation of “Jewish pigs and monkeys,” or a “Zionist abomination,” is rallying behind Britain’s treatment of Israel?

      Is it a coincidence that the British justice system has now allowed sections of Shariah Law to take the place of common law, allowing such practices as the marriage of underage girls when they are not present even present?

      This is why a relatively small issue such as Obama’s shabby treatment of Bibi carried with it such grave implications.

      While Israel’s closest allies are criticizing her, the greatest threat to Israel’s existence, the Iranian nuclear bomb, is well on its way to completion. According to the Nuclear Threat Initiative, Global Security, Janes Consulting, and other sources, Iran already has the delivery systems to not only strike the entirety of Israel and the Sunni Arab world, but several European capitols as well. They also have very close ties to Hamas, whose rockets routinely strike southern Israel. Lebanon’s Hezbollah, meanwhile, has Iranian-made Katyusha rockets that can reach dozens of miles into Israeli territory.

      Not to get too off topic, though. This letter was just meant to discuss the one incident last week.

      • Joe Hullait

        You're accusing the UK of anti-semitic bias? What? With our long line of Prime Ministers who are patrons of the JNF? The UK with our state television broadcasters wholly biased reporting of anything Israeli (in Israel's favor)? And the dominance of Rupert Murdoch's Islamaphobic tabloid press?

        Oh yes, that's the same UK that panders to the fastest growing Islamic population in Europe by continuing slaughter of Muslims in Afghanistan….clearly I've misunderstood my government's tactics. Those tax rises and rising interest rates on my student loan are probably incentives for me to vote them back in. Silly me.

        Oh but of course you got it right with the parliament issuing a voluminous stream of consciousness haranguing of Israeli defensive actions didn't you? Yes, ok, the same parliament presided over by a speaker who at the request of the government will not grant any permission to those willing to speak the truth on Israel. The same parliament that in its last term suspended George Galloway for referring to the profiteering of American and British companies at the expense of Muslim blood in the Middle East.

        You ask if it a coincidence that Britain has one of the largest and fastest growing Islamic populations in Europe?

        Yes it is.

        Granted that some courts in our justice system have delegated decisions to Sharia Law courts. It's a ridiculously stupid move on the part of the courts. But allowing the marriage of underage girls when they are not present? You've definitely been getting too much of your media from the racist Murdochian media.

  • nasserabousamak

    Obama is the only President who has the courage to stand up for justice and the truth. We must begin with Article 49 of the Geneva Convention. Israel is a signatory to this International agreement. So is the United States. The geneva Accords do carry the full weight of International Law. Article 49 is simple, clear, and is not a subject of controversy. It forbids an occupying power from moving its own civilian population onto occupied lands as permanent residents. Despite this prohibition Israel has constructed settlements outside and beyond its borders for more than 40 years. Article 49 and the International community doesn't recognize East jerusalem and the West bank as Israeli territory. It is recognized as occupied lands by Israel.
    So Kudos to Obama for standing up to Israel and for enforcing the Intarnational Law that is so long due. Giving back stolen land is the only way to peace. Obama know this very well. Israel claim the land because they claim they won it during the 1967 war and because it was approved from up above (God). What kind of God would ask his people to steal someone's land?? Besides, the 1967 war was with Egypt NOT the Palestinians. Israel Mis-guide the American public through their American-based media power machine because they are very well aware that most Americans do not know the history of the conflict. I ask you to not allow them to do this any more. Search for the truth and you will find it through Google. Thanks to today's technology.
    May God bless our President and the USA. I pray for peace soon. Remember, justice = peace.

    • Anonymous

      Dan Letovsky is fudging the facts. Israel has been steady stealing Palestinian lands and making up stories about it

    • Jake Morrison

      My god, everyone is seeing what they want to see here. Israel does not control the American Media nassera, and the situation is far more complicated than you've described. Besides, hypothetically speaking, lets say the United States one day decided “no more support for Israel, Israel is now Palestine” and began supporting the Palestinians, as you seem to suggest doing. Do you really think that would create peace? The problem here is that both sides feel they have an equal claim to the land, both rooted in tradition and religious conviction. You cannot solve the problem so simply.

      The problem with Dan's argument is the opposite. There also cannot be peace if the United States only supports Israel, and never criticizes it. I agree with Grant that we generally should do this privately, but there were abnormal circumstances here, arising from the way Vice President Biden was embarrassed by the Israeli's who announced new settlements the day he arrived to talk about a settlement freeze. That is a diplomatic foul, and they deserved to be criticized publicly for it. Our interests overlap heavily with Israel's, but they are also separate, and we need to be assertive and strong when it comes to protecting them.

      That said, Obama is NOT “standing up” to Israel, because this situation does not warrant a major shift in US policy. Israel is a democracy and a loyal ally, and we stand by them and support them until that changes, however imperfect they may be. He is simply expressing his disapproval with their actions on this one issue. You also are misrepresenting Israel's claim to the land. While it is true that Israel's claim is more Biblical and the Palestinian's claim more historical, the truth is that between 1020 BC and 930 BC there WAS a Kingdom of Israel. Both have legitimate claims to the land on some level, which is why we need a two state solution for there ever to be peace. Kudos to Obama for recognizing that the situation is more nuanced than either Dan or Nassera described.

      • http://twitter.com/capitalistchaos Dan Letovsky

        Also, Jake, Israeli claims to the land are not based around Jewish claims to the land. While the Likud coalition government does contain some parties such as Lieberman's Beit Yisrael party, and other small nationalist parties who do use Jewish ancestral arguments as legitimacy, the majority of the state of Israel's legitimacy comes from the original U.N. sponsored partition of 1948.

        This was wholly rejected by the entire Arab world, and the Arabs living in British Palestine, who chose war over a settlement that would have granted them a state almost three times as large as the one they are hoping for today.

      • Anonymous

        I just find it strange you didn’t comment on Article 49 of the Geneva Convention which is the core issue. But I like most of your response. However, the “Kingdom of Israel” you’ve mentioned is mentioned in all three religions. Sadly, people confuse the people of Israel with the State of Israel. When the religions talk about the people of Israel it doesn’t mean as a state simply because there were no countries 2000 years ago. Most people don’t realize this simple fact. God’s promised land in the Torah is not only occupied Palestine it is the entire Middle East from the Eufrates river in Iraq to the Nile river in Egypt. That’s why the flag of Israel has two blue lines which resembles the two rivers. The only solution to this conflict is respecting the religion of others whether historically or biblically.

    • http://twitter.com/capitalistchaos Dan Letovsky

      I don't have time to fully respond to all the awesome commentary yet, but I will just strenuously disagree with your misunderstanding about the causes of the 1967 war.

      It was against the Palestinian militias. whose continued raids into Israeli territory ratcheted up tensions with Egypt, Syria, Jordan, Iraq, et al. While it is probably the case that Nasser encouraged these raids, and so we can trace some funding back to Cairo, it's not accurate to say Palestinians weren't actively involved in the Six Day War.

      I'll get to the other comments later.

      Thanks for commenting

      Ma salaama

      • Anonymous

        Ok, so are you saying that if you win a land at war it should be yours to keep?? If so, why did we kick out Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait in 1990?
        Dan- Winning lands by war will make our world a jungle where the lion eats everyone else. We are not animals in this world and it is time we start acting like civilized humans.

  • Brian Dunn

    Dan,

    The second I saw the title of this article, I knew it was written by you haha. Israel has been a thorn in the side of the United States for decades now. I don't know why you (and others) think we owe Israel something when we don't. Israel owes us, if anything. Israel exists because we created it. There are certain times when we, as the world's strongest nation and a world leader, have to “lay down the law” with allies in order to better the world or work towards peace. This is one of those situations. Israel is defying the United States and other world leaders and causing more tension instead of working towards peace by building these new settlements and refusing to work towards a peace agreement.

    Not to mention the fact that Israel has undermined us the entire time, including sinking one of our ships (the USS Liberty) in 1967. We should have wiped them off the map after that, but instead we did not even retaliate. The idea that we owe anything to Israel is a joke. And, I know you are extremely well-educated and probably more informed than I am on foreign policy issus, but I do not get your position here. And, I do not think America owes Israel even an explanation for this treatment.

    • http://twitter.com/capitalistchaos Dan Letovsky

      Dunn – dude, the U.S. in no way created Israel. It was actually created by the United Nations, then declared a state by David Ben Gurion, and its borders were paid for by the Hagannah and Irgun, which later became the IDF.

      Get back to you later… dinner time. Enjoy your thursday night my friend

      • Brian Dunn

        True, but I mean we obviously played a big part in that. And, I still think we should have blown them off the map haha

  • Mierka Ross

    Dear Mr. Letovsky,
    I commend you for your article. I spent an entire summer traveling about the state of Israel in 2005, when the Israeli government unilaterally emptied Gaza to make room for their Palestinian neighbors. My mother was getting grey hairs but it was important to me to see what all the hubbub in the news was about. I learned during my travels that there is so much more to the state than boundary issues and because of the way our national media flocks to conflict, it is only too easy for the average American to criticize the Middle East. For this reason I would like to inform the student body on some of the good things that Israel has contributed to the world:

    Israel is the only country in the world that had a net gain in trees when entering the 21st century.

    Israel produces more scientific papers per capita than any other nation.

    More than 85% of waste in Israel is treated in a green manner.

    Israel is the only liberal democracy in the Middle East.

    Microsoft’s only research and development facility outside of the United States is in Israel.

    Christopher Reeve (the original superman) called Israel a “world center” for paralysis research.

    Israel has developed the first passive vaccine for mosquito-transmitted West Nile virus.

    The “two-flush” toilets, which save the U.S. billions of gallons of water, were created in Israel.

    Israel has provided immediate emergency aid indiscriminately to 140 countries all over the world, including but most definitely not limited to: the Palestinian National Authority, the United States, Mexico, Haiti, Chile, Turkey, Indonesia, Ethiopia, India, Egypt, Nicaragua, Argentina, Rwanda, and Colombia. Israel is often one of the first countries to respond.

    The list continues. The United States is allied with Israel for these types of reasons. Our relationship with this Middle Eastern country is not based on oil (they have none), but instead on the great contributions Israel makes to medical care, scientific advancement, environmental progress and humanitarian efforts.
    Thank you, Dan for bringing such a country to our notice.
    Best regards,
    Mierka Ross
    University of Richmond ‘10

  • Anonymous

    Dan-I just find it strange you didn’t comment on Article 49 of the Geneva Convention which is the core issue. But I like most of your response. However, the “Kingdom of Israel” you’ve mentioned is mentioned in all three religions. Sadly, people confuse the people of Israel with the State of Israel. When the religions talk about the people of Israel it doesn’t mean as a state simply because there were no countries 2000 years ago. Most people don’t realize this simple fact. God’s promised land in the Torah is not only occupied Palestine it is the entire Middle East from the Eufrates river in Iraq to the Nile river in Egypt. That’s why the flag of Israel has two blue lines which resembles the two rivers. The only solution to this conflict is respecting the religion of others whether historically or biblically.
    By the way, did you know that the Hagannah and the Irgun were declared as terrorist groups in the past?? Did you know that the head of the Hagannah was actually former Prime Minister manahem begin who actually was the Master mind of the King Hotel bombing in the early 1940s that killed 93 British troops. Did you also know that he was on the wanted list by Britain? That was just one story of many. A terrorist actuallt made it as head of state. The same goes with Ariel Sharon, Moshe Diane, and others. Don’t take my word for it, just Google the Prime Ministers of Israel and you will find most if not all were actually terrorists and all made it to heads of state. That is beyond sad. You can’t have peace with terrorists on both sides. You will also find in Google that David ben Gurion, the founder of Israel, admitting that the state of Israel was created by terror in his own words. ” If we didn’t use terror attacks Israel would have never been created”, he said. Sad, isn’t it?
    The Israeli government’s tactics has always been: “What’s bad for America is good for Israel”.
    If America only knew!!!

  • nasserabousamak

    Dan- Ok, so are you saying that if you win a land at war it should be yours to keep?? If so, why did we kick out Saddam Hussein out of Kuwait in 1990?
    Winning lands by war will make our world a jungle where the lion eats everyone else. We are not animals in this world and it is time we start acting like civilized humans.

    • http://twitter.com/capitalistchaos Dan Letovsky

      Not at all. As I said in my earlier post, Israel is making efforts to withdraw from its territories occupied during the Six Day War.

      However, some of these withdrawals are very risky strategically, and so they have placed conditions on the withdrawal from certain areas. This isn't unreasonable at all.

  • nasserabousamak

    Jake- I'm not suggesting that America should dump Israel and side with the Palestinians. That simply will not resolve the issue. That is exactly why the conflict has not been resolved since 1948 because the US sides with Israel all the time. Have you ever wondered why?? Have you ever wondered why the media here always make Israel looks like the poor victim and doesn't broadcast what really goes on in Palestine?
    You must be misinformed if you even doubt that the media is not fully controlled by Israel here in the US.
    America is entitled to hear the truth in the media and not just a one-sided story all the time because poor Israel is not the victim for the past 65 years.

  • Ben Paul

    Hey Dan,

    Fair critcism of the President, limited view of the overall issue. I'm curious to hear your views about the peace process itself including two-state solution, Israeli settlements, and the like. Facebook or here is good.

    Best,
    bp

  • ted B.

    realize that David is employing irony to make a point, but if we wish to define irony as implying a situation where the surface meaning and the underlying meaning do not coincide, consider the following. In the late 50’s and most of the 60’s Israel enjoyed almost universal world sympathy.Now 50 years later Israel is reviled by most of the globe and has become an international pariah. The question must be asked, how was it possible to squander all that goodwill? Obviously the highhanded treatment of the Palestinians, the continued occupation over all these years, must be considered as major contributors to this situation. Hubris, arrogance, the chosen people syndrone all play a part in the reversal of attitudes. But the
    ultimate irony , is that Israel was originally founded in the hope and belief that this new nation would provide a safe haven for the world’s beleagered Jews. At the present time,one is more likely to be attacked for being a Jew in Tel Aviv or Jerusalem than in Tehran or Berlin. In terms of security Israel’s establishment has been a giant failure. With regard to public relations, matters have gone from bad to worse. We cannot blame it all on antisemitism and a very biased world media, since the media was once very much biased in Isral’s favor. It is high time for a serious reappraisal of Israel’s failures

    The basic tool used to minimize risk in the field of investments is something called diversification, which simply means don’t put all your eggs in one basket. That same principle applies in nation building. Concentrating almost half the world’s Jewish population in Israel, one of the most unsafe and unstable regions anywhere, is tantamount tof investing big with Madoff.. A no brainer.
    the world’s Jewish population in one of the most unstable areas of the globe makes as much sense