Trayless Initiative

Trayless plan halted; school called to voluntarily cut waste

Published: January 16, 2009, 3:09 am ET
Waste Audit
Alex Donoho/The Collegian
Senior Jenny Patchen deposits food waste on Thursday into trashcans, the weight of which will be determined by dining hall officials. Audits throughout the first half of the semester will show whether people are voluntarily reducing their food waste, even with trays.
Collegian Staff

Cut down on food waste by spring break, and the dining hall trays stay.

That’s the counteroffer from the University of Richmond’s Sustainability Working Group, which has delivered its decision after members of the student governments charged student opinion wasn’t adequately considered before going permanently trayless was approved in November.

Trays will now remain at least through spring break, except on Fridays — a continuation of a trayless effort initiated this fall. The working group said it would use Fridays to add in student suggestion.

The new plan calls for students appointed by the government associations to survey the amount of food waste in dining hall trash cans, though it was not immediately clear how often. Dining services officials said in December that audits had shown more than 714 pounds of food could be saved weekly by eliminating trays.

Early audits would establish goals for reducing waste and would be followed by a voluntary community effort to achieve them. Under the plan, the trays would remain the second half of the spring semester if the waste reduction met the benchmarks by spring break. That would continue through 2009-10 because officials are aiming to instill solid conservation habits in the incoming class, chief of staff Lori Schuyler wrote in an e-mail.

In the e-mail, addressed on Tuesday to Matthew Whittaker, president of the Richmond College Student Government Association, Schuyler called on the student governments to back full trayless dining should the voluntary campaign not be deemed successful. The e-mail was also sent to members of the committee and Generra Peck, president of the Westhampton College Government Association.

“If the student government associations are willing to wage a campaign to reduce waste, we are happy to postpone the full implementation of trayless dining,” Schuyler wrote, speaking on behalf of the environmental committee.

Pushing a voluntary campaign would groom students to take personal responsibility for conservation, an effect an administrative mandate would not offer, student leaders said.

The deal bucks a broader push to enact sustainability initiatives promptly on campus and meet requirements set by the President’s Climate Commitment, signed by President Edward Ayers in 2007. In December, school officials said installation of energy monitors would be finished, complemented by a two-month recycling initiative sponsored by the RENEW/Sierra Club.

But the new trayless plan was sparse on details about how the student governments and dining services would carry out the campaign. Those decisions, Whittaker said, would be made between dining services officials, Schuyler and student government representatives during the coming weeks.

RCSGA leaders nevertheless expressed hope that refusing a tray would be viewed just as normally as taking one after the campaign.

Schuyler announced the committee’s decision to eliminate trays at a heated Dec. 3 meeting with both student governments. In response, Whittaker and Peck offered an alternate plan the following day to Schuyler, Ayers, the deans of Richmond and Westhampton colleges and Steve Bisese, vice president for student development, Whittaker said.

Student government leaders pushed for a voluntary waste reduction program — which would include an educational component about the benefits of minimizing waste — to last through the spring semester.

They stopped short of agreeing to support a full trayless initiative should the reductions be considered too small, setting the stage for future disagreements with the committee.

“We have gone from a trial period of trayless Fridays, to a period of no trayless days, to a potential period of a trayless semester,” the RCSGA proposal reads. “This may prove to be a crude transition into a very impactful aspect of campus life.”

Students vexed over the decision to eliminate trays have primarily charged that removing them is an unnecessary inconvenience, sentiments that have heartily echoed by some faculty and staff, dining officials say.

Contact staff writer Dan Petty at dan.petty@richmond.edu

Related Article Topics

, ,
Comments »
To post a comment, leave your first and last name and a valid e-mail address. Comments may not appear immediately because they must be approved by a moderator before posting. No registration is required, but you may sign in with DISQUS, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, or OpenID.
  • lauren

    I guess I am dissapointed to see that students got their way on this one. This is just one more example of how students have turned a blind-eye to budgeting and environmental needs because it is more convenient to do so. And once again, the administration has allowed them to do it.
    Because the senates did a poor job participating in the trayless process first semester, I am pretty cynical that they will do their part this semester. The senates have been less than willing to compromise and work with the dhall staff on this issue thus far. I guess I will believe it when I see it.

  • Nolan

    Lauren, when you pay 50 grand to go to school, you grant yourself certain luxuries. I’m all about saving money and eliminating waste. That’s why, when I was on a meal plan, I didn’t over load my plate with food I wasn’t going to eat. Perhaps student self control is a better option than eliminating trays.
    Eliminating trays for me would be a bigger waste of time than anything else. Rather than one trip to get dinner two are required – one for the food and one for the drink. That’s a pain in the butt and one I’m not willing to pay 4500 dollars a year for.

  • Claire

    I don’t agree with you Nolan, but either way I doubt students will stop wasting as much. Even if they do before Spring Break, it’ll just go back to normal once the administration promises the students to keep the trays. After that point this topic will simply arise again. We might as well get rid of them now.

  • Snow

    I must say that if it wasn’t for the trays, sledding tonight would not have been as fun. If it is decided to get rid of the trays then could some be saved so for sledding and possibly rented out like the tents at the gym?